<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/2" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/2</id>
  <updated>2026-06-06T04:42:27Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-06T04:42:27Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Interview with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs  of Staff, Lieutenant General Juan Martín Paleo</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3427" />
    <author>
      <name>Visión Conjunta</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3427</id>
    <updated>2026-05-26T20:08:46Z</updated>
    <published>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Interview with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs  of Staff, Lieutenant General Juan Martín Paleo
Authors: Visión Conjunta
Abstract: In 2020, the current political leadership of Defence issued the corresponding directive that initiated a new planning cycle. What is your vision of Military Strategy in the light of this document?</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>University intellectuals and the military, what did we (not) make of our Malvinas war?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3426" />
    <author>
      <name>Moresi, Alejandro</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3426</id>
    <updated>2026-05-26T19:54:04Z</updated>
    <published>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: University intellectuals and the military, what did we (not) make of our Malvinas war?
Authors: Moresi, Alejandro
Abstract: In the year 2021, the ESGC's Advanced Course in Military Strategy and Senior Management had to solve a long-term military strategy problem that in the situation was posed as a requirement of the National Strategy that demanded answers about the future, so it had to immerse itself in strategic uncertainty for its resolution. Here is the problem: The Strategic Planning area was asked to propose actions to optimise the strategic situation for the period 2030 - 2050 in the Antarctic and South Atlantic area, based on three problems detected by the national strategy, which foresees at least three working hypotheses. The aspects to be resolved in the case of Argentina are as follows: &gt; Characteristics of the future conflict &gt; Scenarios - Strategic environment. &gt; Use of the "proxy" concept for the confrontation in the South Atlantic (positions and actors involved). &gt; Capabilities required of the Argentine Military Instrument (IMA) for the cases: &gt; Neutrality &gt; Strategic confluence with one of the two powers, Eastern or Western. &gt; Proposed general requirements for other branches of government</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>University intellectuals and the military, what did we (not) make of our Malvinas war?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3425" />
    <author>
      <name>Guber, Rosana</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3425</id>
    <updated>2026-05-26T15:50:43Z</updated>
    <published>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: University intellectuals and the military, what did we (not) make of our Malvinas war?
Authors: Guber, Rosana
Abstract: This article presents a reflection on the three interpretative frameworks from which university and military intellectuals in Argentina have understood the Malvinas/Falklands War against the United Kingdom in 1982.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Geopolitics of the global commons: securitisation of spaces and resources not subject to state jurisdiction</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3424" />
    <author>
      <name>Borrell, Juan José</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3424</id>
    <updated>2026-05-26T15:31:46Z</updated>
    <published>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Geopolitics of the global commons: securitisation of spaces and resources not subject to state jurisdiction
Authors: Borrell, Juan José
Abstract: Since the end of the Cold War, large spaces not subject to state jurisdiction under the concept of global commons have entered the security considerations of NATO’s central powers. Thinktanks, international development agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and international organisations have been dealing in reports and official documents with various initiatives on a global scale to implement actions for the projection, control and denial of access to the global commons. These initiatives, which also include the sovereign spaces of developing and peripheral countries, particularly regions with a rich endowment of natural resources such as land, water, forests, fish fauna and biodiversity, are evidence of a clear process of growing strategic interest, which at the same time is coupled with preexisting dynamics of securitisation of the environment, both of which could potentially legitimise the ius ad bellum. Today, the projection of power over the global commons takes on a structural, indirect, asymmetric, dispersed, soft and discrete mode. This subject is of vital importance for National Defence, as it is evidence of the new character that hegemonic competition has acquired in the 21st century.</summary>
    <dc:date>2022-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

