Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3426
Title: University intellectuals and the military, what did we (not) make of our Malvinas war?
Authors: Moresi, Alejandro
Ríos Hudson, Mariana
Keywords: Senior Leadership Course
Military strategy
Education
Strategic Planning
Antarctic and South Atlantic area
Issue Date: Jul-2022
Publisher: Escuela Superior de Guerra Conjunta de las Fuerzas Armadas. Argentina
Series/Report no.: Visión Conjunta;Year 14; Nº26
Abstract: In the year 2021, the ESGC's Advanced Course in Military Strategy and Senior Management had to solve a long-term military strategy problem that in the situation was posed as a requirement of the National Strategy that demanded answers about the future, so it had to immerse itself in strategic uncertainty for its resolution. Here is the problem: The Strategic Planning area was asked to propose actions to optimise the strategic situation for the period 2030 - 2050 in the Antarctic and South Atlantic area, based on three problems detected by the national strategy, which foresees at least three working hypotheses. The aspects to be resolved in the case of Argentina are as follows: > Characteristics of the future conflict > Scenarios - Strategic environment. > Use of the "proxy" concept for the confrontation in the South Atlantic (positions and actors involved). > Capabilities required of the Argentine Military Instrument (IMA) for the cases: > Neutrality > Strategic confluence with one of the two powers, Eastern or Western. > Proposed general requirements for other branches of government
URI: https://cefadigital.edu.ar/handle/1847939/3426
ISSN: 2250-5601 (En línea)
Appears in Collections:Revista Visión Conjunta

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
VC26-2022 MORESI.pdfVC26-2022 MORESI992.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons